Commit df5230ef authored by Committed by Ronald S. Bultje
obu: parse uv_mult etc. as signed integers
The spec subtracts the signed offset from all of these when using them, like it does for e.g. ar_coeffs_y_plus_128, although for some reason the naming scheme is inconsistent here. Either way, it makes more sense to treat them as signed integers than unsigned integers. To avoid confusion since the name of the field is the same as the one in the spec, we mark the type as int8_t (resp. int16_t for the 9-bit field) to make it clear to the user that these are already signed integers.
Showing with 6 additions and 6 deletions