Commit 87b1084c authored by hartman's avatar hartman
Browse files

TS demux: Clarify a for() loop.

This will likely fix CID 247, which seems like a false.
I don't see how PIDClean is called twice here, I think it's a limitation in the Coverity scan logic.
parent 34aef4ad
......@@ -4021,7 +4021,7 @@ static void PATCallBack( demux_t *p_demux, dvbpsi_pat_t *p_pat )
if( !pid->b_valid || pid->psi ) continue;
for( j = 0; j < i_pmt_rm; j++ )
for( j = 0; j < i_pmt_rm && pid->b_valid; j++ )
{
int i_prg;
for( i_prg = 0; i_prg < pid->p_owner->i_prg; i_prg++ )
......@@ -4041,8 +4041,6 @@ static void PATCallBack( demux_t *p_demux, dvbpsi_pat_t *p_pat )
PIDClean( p_demux->out, pid );
break;
}
if( !pid->b_valid ) break;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment